<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>The Daily Bench</title><link>https://thedailybench.in/</link><description>Daily summaries of latest judgments from the Andhra Pradesh High Court, Telangana High Court and the Supreme Court of India</description><item><title>AP High Court: Lorry owner stays liable as insurance began after the accident, but compensation raised to Rs 4.36 lakh</title><link>https://thedailybench.in/judgment/aphc-aphc010217482012_1_2026-09-28/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">aphc-aphc010217482012_1_2026-09-28</guid><pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><description>High Court of Andhra Pradesh — A lorry owner appealed against a tribunal award for the death of an 18-year-old cyclist, arguing his insurance premium was paid on the day of the accident. The High Court found the policy was taken after the accident, so the owner remains liable, but it increased the compensation on its own after finding the tribunal had calculated it wrongly.</description></item><item><title>Telangana HC: College cannot hold a student's transfer certificate over a fee claim; orders immediate release</title><link>https://thedailybench.in/judgment/tshc-hbhc010663002026_1_2026-09-24/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">tshc-hbhc010663002026_1_2026-09-24</guid><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><description>High Court for the State of Telangana — A student who had secured a seat in the 5-year LL.B. course through TG LAWCET-2026 said his previous junior college refused to release his transfer and study certificates unless he paid Rs 50,000, which put his admission at risk because counselling deadlines were close. The High Court ordered the college to release the documents immediately.</description></item><item><title>Telangana HC: State cannot reopen 1960 land assignment decades later without proving it was assigned land</title><link>https://thedailybench.in/judgment/tshc-hbhc010234832026_1_2026-09-22/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">tshc-hbhc010234832026_1_2026-09-22</guid><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><description>High Court for the State of Telangana — The State appealed against a Single Judge's order quashing a 2020 resumption of about 13 acres in Nizampet village, Medchal-Malkajgiri district, under the Telangana Assignment (Prohibition of Transfers) Act, 1977. A Division Bench of the High Court dismissed three connected writ appeals, holding that the State acted far too late and could not show the land was assigned land with a bar on transfers.</description></item><item><title>Telangana HC orders refund of Rs 3.32 lakh fee to student whose homoeopathy seat was cancelled over low NEET score</title><link>https://thedailybench.in/judgment/tshc-hbhc010480642026_1_2026-09-22/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">tshc-hbhc010480642026_1_2026-09-22</guid><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><description>High Court for the State of Telangana — A student was allotted a BHMS seat under the management quota by the Kaloji Narayana Rao University of Health Sciences and paid Rs 3,32,000 in tuition fees, but the university later cancelled her admission because her NEET score was 128 instead of the required 144. The High Court directed the college to refund the fee, without deciding whether the cancellation itself was valid.</description></item><item><title>Supreme Court: Electricity boards face strict, not absolute, liability for electrocution; writ petitions unsuitable where facts are disputed</title><link>https://thedailybench.in/judgment/sci-2026_8_489_505/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">sci-2026_8_489_505</guid><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><description>Supreme Court of India — Two electrocution victims' claimants had won compensation of about Rs 25.5 lakh and Rs 44.3 lakh from the Karnataka High Court against the state power transmission company, which treated its liability as absolute and ignored disputed facts. The Supreme Court held that such cases involve strict liability, which has recognised exceptions, and that a writ petition is not the right remedy when negligence and other facts are genuinely disputed.</description></item><item><title>Supreme Court: Employee cannot be sacked for 'suppressing' a criminal case he did not know about; employers must follow a two-step enquiry</title><link>https://thedailybench.in/judgment/sci-2026_8_550_563/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">sci-2026_8_550_563</guid><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><description>Supreme Court of India — An employee of the Fertilizers and Chemicals Travancore Ltd. was terminated for giving false information about his criminal antecedents, after a non-cognizable police report under Sections 323 and 504 IPC turned up against him. The Supreme Court held that he genuinely did not know about the report, and that the employer had not properly considered whether the matter justified dismissal.</description></item></channel></rss>